Sciacca Mystery what a great research!

Thank you so much dott.Giuseppe Rajola!
Lost Island Project is proud to have you as an active supporter of our research and we are very glad to have you in our team!
Thank you for all your outstanding work!
We hope you enjoy reading with us his incredible research on the Sciacca Coral.
Reserach is knowledge...

Enjoy!

Read More »

Sciacca Mystery the End pt.V

From the sea, in 15 years of work, non continuous as we have seen, well over 14 million kg of coral were extracted! An unimaginable amount for the human mind to grasp. But how much is still there, in the sea? And how much is buried underneath the lava that must have spewed out of the mouths of these volcanoes in the course of millenniums? And even before?
An engineer friend of mine, one who builds roads, amused himself making a calculation: with such a mass of coral, we could have paved the entire highway from Trapani to Trieste!
I submitted the results of this final analysis to Margherita Superchi who, as I expected, said: “I would like to do a Knoop hardness test.”
Perhaps many are familiar with the Mohs hardness scale. This is an empirical meter, a simple enough device, that we owe to Austrian naturalist Friederich Mohs, who lived between the 1700s and 1800s and that is used to assess the hardness of materials that exist in nature. The scale starts with talk, the softest of materials, and ends with diamonds, which are perhaps the hardest. According to the Mohs scale coral is level 3, a material that can be scratched using a steel tip.
Since 1839 (when Mohs died) new methods have been experimented that are more precise and scientifically accurate. The most appropriate to our case, according to Margherita Superchi, was the Knoop hardness measurement, from the name of another researcher, Frederick Knoop, who tested it for the first time in 1939 in the laboratories of the National Bureau of Standards, in the United States.
So I prepared the corals, and sent them to the Institute of Science and Technology of Ceramic Materials in Faenza, the pride and joy of the National Research Council.
A little more than one week later we received the results. They may be difficult to understand by those not familiar with this work but in simple terms the results confirm that, in fact, the coral of Sciacca, in addition to changing its color and basic components, also modified its hardness.
The Coral of Sciacca has no more secrets, at least concerning its origin and morphological characteristics.
Now I know why it “chimed”. My research is finished.
And to think that it all began with a child’s game...
The conversations with Margherita Superchi, the sample sent to the CISGEM, the first analyses with the Raman. Then the chemical composition by Robert Bodnar, when the going really got serious! And the radiocarbon datings… one, two, three, four. And, finally, the Knoop hardness tests.
A long road. Long and fascinating.
Someone might wonder: what for? I don’t have the right answer to that.
If this someone exists I could say that many of man’s discoveries in the course of millenniums were the result of a thirst for knowledge, of curiosity, of the desire to know what lies around the corner. That’s what it was like for me, and with the mystery of the Sciacca Coral.

The End.
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!

Read More »

Sciacca Mystery the End pt.IV

After the euphoria, the joy, the satisfaction, I realized that four thousand years was too... little! Things didn’t quite match up! I decided to make one final attempt. I took another piece of coral from Sciacca, blackened and full of holes and sent it to CEDAD.
On the following page I submit the results of the tests.

7,000-7,500 years Before Christ! In other words, 9,000-9,500 years ago! For I needed to add the two thousand years from year zero – the year of the birth of Christ – to the present, give or take a year.
Now it made sense. In other words, something extraordinary had happened in the area of the volcanic system Empedocles over several millenniums.
Every underwater volcanic phenomenon, with its production of gas, magma, smoke, ashes, raises the temperature of the water even by as much as 1,000 degrees, as maintained by Prof. Gianni Lanzafame, whom I contacted regarding this.
These temperatures, of course, cause the instantaneous death of all forms of marine life in the area. Obviously even coral. The experiments carried out by Superchi and Bodnar indicated why the coral changed from red to orange and, especially, what happened to its chemical composition, profoundly transformed by the increase in iron, manganese, copper and uranium that caused it to lose the characteristics of organic material. Thus the reason it was preserved until now. In an area so profoundly affected by marine volcanic activity through centuries and centuries, imagine how many events there must have been.
Every time there was an eruption, the same phenomenon was repeated: the water in the sea became overheated and this, together with the substances spewed by the underwater volcanoes, modified the structure of the coral, transforming it from organic to inorganic. In other words – turning it to stone. All the coral in the area, and there was a considerable amounts these seas were rich in plankton, separated from the walls upon which it was growing and accumulated on the bottom, in the deepest areas, specifically the Graham Shoal.
And this for thousands and thousands of years. Not only: I would like to emphasise another aspect that is no less important for our research. It is true that every time there was an underwater eruption this killed all forms of life; It is also true that, once the eruption ends, what remains is a habitat very rich in mineral salts, where the sea water creates an interchange between the area of the volcanic activity and the immediate vicinity not affected by the volcanic activity. Thus in a few years, the site of the eruptions is once again rich in life, marine flora and fauna that rush to re-inhabit it. And so the coral also, within a few years, will once again populate these new, virgin rocks, to continue this extraordinary cycle of nature...
In an article he wrote a few years ago Mimmo Macaluso describes one of his immersions to the Isola Ferdinandea: “It’s almost surreal. We are immersed in another world, beautiful and unsettling, pullulating with life. The materials that erupted in 1831 and more recently, very rich in minerals, were an exceptional support to the growth of numerous species of algae that found nourishment and sustenance. The same applies to the fish as in this very deep area of the Mediterranean they can find refuge and food.”

This is the exact confirmation of my theory. And the same goes for coral, naturally, which changed its nature and amassed on the bottom of the sea.
Until one fine day Bertu Ammareddu comes around...

To Be Continued...
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!

Read More »

Sciacca Mystery the End pt.III


Radiocarbon tests, for those who may not be aware, determine the date of a body, object or material. So far the tests on the Sciacca samples had proven that this coral had been, how I can say it, a victim of volcanic phenomena. But we already knew this: the entire area we are talking about is full of large and small active craters.
Bodnar’s tests demonstrated something more: the volcanic phenomena had modified the very composition, the chemical make-up of the coral, infusing it with the elements of volcanic emissions rich in iron, manganese, copper and uranium.
An extreme, perhaps definitive step was now being proposed: dating the coral by radiocarbon tests. I didn’t know whether I was more excited or more frightened... At any rate I said yes.
“There is a Center of Excellence (that is in southern Italy) where they do these things and do them very well. I am speaking of the CEDAD, the Dating and Diagnostic Center of the University of Salento, Department of Engineering and Innovation, in Lecce.”
“I will call them tomorrow and see if they can help us out.”
The following morning Margherita Superchi called me back and said that she had spoken with the CEDAD: they’re waiting for the rough samples and are happy to take part in this adventure.
“Choose two or three samples and send them”, she said in her simultaneously sweet and peremptory tone...
Sounds easy: what pieces of coral do I choose? Which are the most suitable? This isn’t like the lots of new, live coral that I buy...
I found these at home, they were left by my great -grandfather... and I don’t know exactly where they’re from... Just that they come from Sciacca.
From among the rough coral of Sciacca I chose two very different pieces, one a beautiful intense orange color and the other of a duller color, slightly blackened. Then I added a third piece: a piece of mud, or rather ash of volcanic origin, torn from the sea and containing many small branches of coral of a deep orange color... those were the three samples to be examined...
One month later I was taking part in a working group when I received a call on my mobile... it was from Milan.
I answered: it was Margherita Superchi. Such a discreet, attentive person as she must have good reasons to call me on my mobile.
“Am I disturbing you? Sorry, I called you at your office and they told me you were at a meeting. But I couldn’t wait any longer, I had to talk to you: I have the dates from Lecce. Are you sitting down?
“Listen: sample S2, the deep orange color is dated – give or take a year - approximately 2,000/2,400 years ago, sample S3, the one that’s slightly blackened, dates back to 4,000/4,400 years ago and the mud to 2,300/2,500 years ago. Your theory is confirmed in full!”
Of course my meeting ended in that instant. The people who were with me will remember: I was so excited I couldn’t contain myself… and I’m usually so self-contained. The radiocarbon tests had proven that the coral torn from the sea by the coral boats, passage after passage over the bank (or rather over the deposit, as Mazzarelli would say) was more damaged and thus older, more ancient.
Four thousand years ago: this coral was growing and dying four thousand years ago, when those seas were being sailed, just think, by Phoenicians, Egyptians, Cretans... the time when the Hammurabi code was being written, the period in which Stonehenge was being completed in England, near Salisbury, the years in which the Palace of Knossos was being constructed in Crete!

And yet there was still something that did not convince me...

To Be Continued...
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!


Read More »

Sciacca Mystery the End pt.II

 

A university professor friend of mine came to my aid by telling me that in the U.S., there was a certain Professor Robert Bodnar at Virginia Tech University, a geochemist, and that he was conducting some very interesting experiments using highly advanced instruments. An American! Talk about coral to an American! Lord help us!
I send him an email, introducing myself and explaining what I was looking for. He told me to send him some samples, but that he couldn’t promise anything.
Right away! The samples immediately left by super fast courier and from that moment on, for a month, I heard nothing. I didn’t have the courage to write or call, to disturb him, or perhaps because I didn’t want to hear that he had no time to waste on such nonsense.
Instead, after approximately two months of anguish, one fine day I received an email... Bodnar has answered, and what an answer!!! He had worked and how! I include the complete report of the analyses that professor Bodnar carried out: they are extremely interesting.
For our purposes, at this time, I believe what Bodnar writes in his e-mail will be sufficient:
“The analyses carried out using the ICPMS System (Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry) show very interesting results.
“The corals of Sciacca, compared to other corals, are greatly enriched by iron, manganese, copper and uranium. These are elements associated with underwater volcanic and hydrothermal activity, thus your theory that the coral of Sciacca is in some way connected to volcanic activity appears to be confirmed.”
This was the second piece of our puzzle: the chemical composition of the Sciacca coral had modified... thus its special characteristics: color, sound, hardness.
Margherita Superchi, to whom I immediately sent the results of Bodnar’s research, was enthusiastic and fascinated. And she proposed “what do you say we do some radiocarbon dating tests?”

To Be Continued...
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!




Read More »

Sciacca Mystery the End pt I

I don’t know if the same thing happens to you. But sometimes you meet someone and are immediately attracted, someone you can talk with, someone who understands your dreams and ideas and with whom you feel completely at ease. Persons on the same wave length as you, who are endowed with the greatest gift the good Lord gave to man: the ability to listen to others, to make them feel at ease.
In my case, one of these persons was, and is, Margherita Superchi. Scientist, gemmologist of international renown, the guiding light and director, for many years, of the CISGEM, one of the most prestigious gemmology centers in the world.
Well, whenever I had (and have) any doubt, when there is a question in my mind, I know who to turn to: Margherita is always there, gentle, kind, ready to answer all my questions, simple or complex as they may be.
A few years ago I spoke to her for the first time of the coral of Sciacca. My company had asked the CISGEM to analyse some stones. One afternoon I was told that there was a dottoressa Superchi on the phone who needed some clarifications.

“Am I disturbing you?”
“Absolutely not. Luckily we are on the phone and you can’t see my hands: I was selecting some pieces of Sciacca coral  for jewellery.”
“Can one still find any of this coral?”
“At sea no, but if you only knew how much of it there is in Torre del Greco, and how jealously it is guarded by our companies...”
And so I spoke to her of the Sciacca epic, of this coral collected in such unimaginable quantities, of my idée fixe: what happened to this coral? Why does it “chime”? How did it get to us?
“Coral – I told her –as you well know, is organic matter. How is it possible that such a vast quantity was accumulated in an area of such modest dimensions, compared to the entire Strait of Sicily?
An area that is also strongly affected by volcanic activity... And why this very singular orange-salmon color? And more: why is it, that when it is picked up, slid along your hands and dropped, it produces such a particular sound?”
“Dottoressa, have you ever seen the coral of Sciacca, have you ever touched it?”
“Listen let’s do this. Send me a few samples of the coral. But not just the rough coral; send me also other corals fished recently, and of which you know the origin. I want to see what happens.”
The following morning several samples of Sciacca coral, as well as coral fished in Sardinia, Croatia etc. left for Milan.
A couple of weeks later, Superchi called me back and said:
“We did some tests with the Raman spectroscope and got some interesting results: I am sure you know that the Raman, to put simply, screens the matter being examined, as if it were tracing its DNA. Well, all the samples you sent me had the same profile, they all have the same origin: they are all Corallium rubrum. With one difference: the coral from Sciacca – how can I make you understand? – has one “peak” less, they have something different from the other coral harvested in Sardinia and Croatia.
“So I tried something: I took two parts of the branches fished recently and heated them... and do you know what happened? They lost their bright red color and became a new, beautiful orange color; then we redid the Raman test and you know what happened? These corals also lost a “peak”!
Now we were getting somewhere: all the pieces of coral sent were of the species Corallium rubrum, if those fished recently were subjected to heating, the red became orange and modified something in their DNA or... what will you! It was a first step.
We needed to understand why this was happening.
“Do you know anyone who can carry out some thorough tests on the chemical composition of this coral?” asked Margherita Superchi.
“Give me a few days and I’ll let you know” I answered.
I didn’t even know where to begin...

To Be Continued...
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!

Read More »

Coral Mystery pt X Biology br Dott.ssa Margherita Superchi

Coral Reproduction
The genital organs of coral are located inside the polyps and they have different genders in the sense that there are both male and female colonies. In some cases we also noted the presence of hermaphrodite colonies, created by  the fusion of two colonies.
The maturing of the male reproductive cells occurs after one year while for females 2 years are required.
How does reproduction take place? By fertilisation of by larval reproduction.
Fertilisation: following emission from the male polyp, the spermatozoa navigate looking for a female polyp to fertilise.
The mechanism of attraction is still a mystery.
Fertilisation then takes place inside the female polyp.
The young larva, called planula, develops in approximately 20/30 days before exiting into the open sea.
This process usually occurs during the month of June.
In the future this will involve a number of considerations – which will certainly arouse polemics – regarding the possibility of fishing before the new organisms, the planulae, are born.

Larval Reproduction: The planulae leave the mother polyp and wander through the waters looking for a hard and rocky substratum upon which to deposit. Once they find it, a new miracle takes place: the mouth with its eight tentacles positions itself to collect food, the first gastrovascular canals develop and in about twelve days, what will be the skeletal axis begins to form…the skeletal axis is the interior of the branch, the calcium carbonate skeleton, and in about 2/3 days it gradually becomes red.
What had originally been a planula begins to feed and grow, to swell like a large pimple: and this is when a second polyp appears!
From this moment on the two work to secrete, building the skeletal axis that will be fully formed in six months!
Thus from larva to larva, polyp to polyp, the coral branch grows and develops. As we can see, all the vital functions of a coral colony are in the sarcosoma, the external part of the polyp.
If all the coral of Sciacca, as noted by many, suddenly appeared without a sarcosoma, what would this mean? Indubitably and unquestionably that we are in the presence of dead coral, my friends, of which only the skeleton remains, and we don’t even really know why...

to be Continued...
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!

Read More »

Coral Mystery pt IX Biology by Dott.ssa Margherita Superchi

They also studied the “foods” preferred by the polyp colonies. And do you know what they like to eat? Shrimp! Naturally, tiny, microscopic shrimp contained in the plankton!
Today we can say that we know much more. But let’s get back to the structure of the polyp.
The polyp is the structural unit of the branch: viewed in its entirety, it is shaped like a delicate white flower, transparent, with its eight petals swaying in the current and indicative of how and why its animal nature has for so long been ignored.
It is the polyps that provide nutrients to the colony, using their long tentacles to capture tiny particles of plankton fluctuating in the water and by swallowing dissolved substances also found in the water.
These substances circulate internally by internal secretion and cause the axial skeleton to grow. In fact, if you cut through a branch you can actually see the concentric circles of growth.
The times of opening/closing of the polyps have been studied and apparently they respond to the demand for food that comes from the colony: the hungrier it is the longer the polyps remain open.
The growing times of a colony vary from zone to zone, subject to subject and are closely linked to the quantity of food present in the water as well as the number of other colonies present within the same area.
Just think that in the zone of Portofino, on a single bank, in a surface area of just one square meter, we counted more than one thousand colonies.
Given the crowding it is clear that it would be highly difficult for any of the coral branches to reach any great size. To give you an idea, think of a forest: wherever the trees are overly abundant they rarely grow tall and robust. But if there are only a few, and if they manage to feed well, then they can become splendid corms.
Since the causes of growth are too numerous and too diversified, I must confess that studies of such aspects have yet to provide universally valid results. Considering the numerous studies that have been undertaken (especially HARMELIN) we can risk giving a vertical growth rate of 6-7 mm per year for young colonies and 3-5 for colonies with secondary ramifications.
Why does coral ramify? In my modest opinion, in order to collect more food by having multiple mouths in different positions.
Why are there branches that are nice and smooth and others that are, well, rather contorted?
That depends on where the colonies are located and on currents. A unidirectional current will give a nice smooth coral (like the ceiling of grottoes); a variable current provides a rougher coral, rather like a bush.
In order to anchor itself to the bank, coral needs a rigid substratum. Naturally it prefers zones that have a coral substratum, formed of calcium concretions but it can also attach itself to mud and sand.
We should also keep in mind that coral grows where there is little or no light. So that in shallow areas it grows wherever there are grottoes or ravines while at greater depths it can be found in open areas.
Another important fact is that coral prefers waters that are not necessarily calm but where the marine currents do not cause violent eddies or whirls.
Inversely, a total absence of marine currents does not allow coral to live as there is no “passage” of food. As for pollution, if there is little contamination coral tends to grow while it cannot live at all if the waters are contaminated.

to be Continued...
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!

Read More »

Coral Mystery pt.VIII Biology by Dott.ssa Margherita Superchi

 This is its identification card:
scientific name:    Corallium rubrum
phylum:         Cnidaria
class:         Anthozoa (Animal flower: from the Greek     “ἄυθος/anthos” flower, and “ζῷον/zoon” animal)
subclass:         Octocorallia
order:         Gorgoniaceae

The Cnidaria is divided into 4 classes, one of these being the Anthozoa class which comes in the form of a polyp and is in turn divided into 2 sub-classes, according to the number of tentacles:
Hexacorallia (6 tentacles or multiples of 6) include reef corals, found on barrier banks, and commonly called madreporaria, sea anemones, black coral and gorgonacea.
Octocorallia, this is the coral we work with: Corallium rubrum, Corallium japonicum and another 27 species of coral.

Anatomy of Red Coral

The anatomy of coral is relatively simple, and is composed of:
- polyp colonies
- skeleton
- external surface

Regarding the polyp colonies: the small polyps with eight tentacles live in colonies, inside the skeleton, and transmit information, sensations, food, etc. through a system of canals in the external surface.
Too simple? I can provide some additional data.
The small polyps are in contact with the external world. They live in the water and from water they receive nutrients but are also subject to its dangers: fish, parasites, storms, volcanic activity, this we have seen, correct? It is also the polyps that take nutrition from the water, the plankton, which they digest and that is used to increase the skeletal axis.
Then there is what for the sake of simplicity we have called the external surface of the polyps but that we must of necessity call by its true name: sarcosoma. What is this? The sarcosoma is the whole of the tissues that cover the axial skeleton just like a glove covers a finger. The skeleton therefore is made from an external secretion. The skeleton of coral is entirely mineralised as it is composed of calcium carbonate, crystallised in the form of calcite. Inside the skeleton there is a network of canals very similar to the circulatory system.
It is through this system of canals that all parts of the skeleton are fed and all information is passed to the entire colony of polyps.
In fact, if we try to touch a single polyp, even a peripheral one, the polyp recognizes danger and conceals itself from view by completely contracting within its cavity, as will all the polyps of the colony: indicating that the information is immediately filtered from polyp to polyp.
Therefore we cannot consider the polyps as living autonomously within a colony but as mouths through which the coral feeds and maintains contact with the outside world.
We have already mentioned the “Red Coral” research group composed of more than 20 Universities and Marine Biology Institutes from all over Europe. These scientists divided their research on coral into individual tasks and studies, to acquire more knowledge, until then very limited, on how it grows, reproduces and feeds.
One member who has done much in the sector of nutrition is the Naples Zoological Station “Anton Dhorn”, through the Ischia Section at the time directed by my dear friend Gianni Russo.
Dhorn retrieved colonies of coral from the sea and placed them in a tank. He then performed extensive studies on the opening and closing of the polyp colonies and noted that they all expanded, that is the polyps come out when they are hungry and re-enter the sarcosoma as soon as they are sated. One would think for a short nap...

to be Continued...
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!










Read More »

Coral Mystery pt.VII the Study

 
The Second Technical Meeting on Red Coral of the Mediterranean was thus held in Torre del Greco at the end of September 1988.
the final document states “it is indispensable, for purposes of an exact assessment of coral, to carry out a systematic inquiry and a precise evaluation of the resources of red coral in the entire Mediterranean area.
“Only after such an inquiry can we determine whether red coral is truly about to become extinct.
“Scientists must undertake a series of studies on how and in what quantities coral grows in the various geographic areas, on the phenomena that delay its growth (pollution in primis), the criteria, if there are any, for its reproduction in laboratories or by breeding.
“Only after we have this data will it be possible to ensure a rational exploitation of the resources and a balanced rotation of fishing zones that also considers the supply needed for manufacture.”
It was on this occasion that they established the basis for the “Italian Group for Coral Research” whose enthusiastic members included about twenty Universities and Marine Biology Institutes. Fabio Cicogna was appointed coordinator, having done everything possible to ensure the success of the Consultation. Another member was the Oceanology and Paleoecology Institute of the University of Catania, which assumed the task of studying the Coral of Sciacca.
Under the leadership of Prof. Italo Di Geronimo, Professors Antonietta Rosso and Rossana Sanfilippo did some excellent research, both at sea and in the laboratory. Meticulous, accurate and difficult work. This is the final report:
“...in conclusion, based on the data emerging from this research and in literature we can formulate some initial theories on the possible origin of the coral banks of Sciacca. Specifically:
“In the area of the Sciacca banks there are submerged reliefs of volcanic and sedimentary nature, that could host or could have hosted red coral.
“The fossil banks exploited in the last century appear to be related only to submerged reliefs of volcanic origin while there is no indications of dead red coral around the other reliefs.
“This fact could be related to the scanty cohesion of the tuffite that composes the volcanic structures and that in the presence of occasional strong currents or even small seismic movements, could be subject to fragmentation, slides and falls that result in a continutous, and sometimes large accumulation of matter at their base. A ring of mixed organogenic and inorganic debris, rich in fragments and colonies of red coral, which could also slide into the surrounding bathyal mud would form an underwater bank.
The ingegni of the previous century would fish inside these rings around the submerged structures, scattering the material that the dredges could not grasp along the bottom as it was dragged, thus enlarging the area of the “bank”.
The more superficial, and youngest, material extracted was generally of better quality than the lower layers, regardless of when it was buried.
The oldest layer of red coral could be very old but almost certainly not antecedent to the last glacial period (about 18,000 years ago) because no fauna characteristic of a cold environment were found in the thanatocoenoses.
Further studies could clarify the origin of the Sciacca banks. In particular, it would be interesting to attempt to reconstruct the recent sediment stratification of the area, using absolute dating on the skeletal remains. Such a study would give a more detailed idea of the time required to form the Sciacca banks.”
It was an invitation! They had done an excellent job in Catania, but – as they themselves admit – further studies and tests were required. They had turned on a light in my head that I just could not turn off...

to be Continued...
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!

Read More »

Coral Mystery pt.VI the Study

About the second bank, the one discovered in August 1878, Canestrini observes that “it too is approximately 200 meters deep, according to our sounding lines, and is covered in mud, as was evidenced by the dredging performed on site. It is more extensive than the previous one, as the length is approximately one mile and about ¾ of a mile in width. It still contains a moderate quantity of coral even now, as proven by the fact that on 26 and 27 July there were between eighteen and twenty trawlers fishing. The presence of this quantity of coral was also demonstrated by our dredging, which revealed that it was of excellent quality, as it is generally of a beautiful red color and only a small quantity is darkish or black. We may presume that during this year the bank will be so exploited that any future fishing will not be worth the cost of the undertaking. Here too we found that all the coral lacked a sarcosoma, that it is dead, and so there is no hope that it may grow or reproduce.”
Of the third bank, the one found in 1880, Canestrini writes: “of the three it is the most extensive, as its length may be assessed at 2.5 miles and its width is 2 miles. It is approximately 180 meters in depth, oscillating, according to our depth sounders, from a minimum of 148 metres to a maximum of 200 meters.
“It too, like the other banks in the area, is covered in mud.
“The coral we collected there was dead, and we also gathered some other animal species found on the other banks. As for the quantity of the coral, we can say it was significant, because even this year there are approximately 200 trawlers fishing, and we collected a significant quantity with our own nets. But the quality is very poor; the tiny shrubs are generally short and thin and the color tends to be blackish, thus the commercial price of this coral is rather low. It is highly likely that in a few years fishing on this bank will no longer be profitable and will be abandoned.”

to be Continued...
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!


Read More »

Lost Island is back

Hi Divers,
Lost Island Project is Back!
in these 10 days we have travelled along Europe to learn more about what we could do in our research. We are ready to Rock the Bank Graham!
Stay with us!
Enjoy!

Read More »

Coral Mystery pt.V the Study

We have one incontrovertible truth: in 13 seasons of fishing, from 1875 to 1886, 14 million kilos of coral were torn from the sea. Yes, you heard right: fourteen million kilos!
We know something else: this coral was different from all others, of an inferior quality, so writes in his report to the Minister, Commander Accini of the frigate ‘L’Esploratore’ who had “directed traffic” around the bank in 1875 and Commander La Via, who sent the Minister a detailed report on the fishing around the bank discovered in 1878. Commander La Via also writes of the quality of the coral, saying:
“The coral harvested on this bank is a common red coral and of a rather inferior quality, both because of the thinness of the branches and that fact that it is blackened in various points, what the fishermen call burnt, attributing the fact to the vicinity of volcanic soil. However, the inferior quality is compensated by the quantity, which greatly exceeds the amount harvested along the coast of Africa and elsewhere.”
There are other important elements: the quality was inferior to the coral fished elsewhere, the coral was blackened because it was near volcanic areas, the quantity harvested was much greater than a boat could normally succeed in finding off the coasts of Africa or elsewhere. So what coral was this?
Prof. Giovanni Canestrini comes to our aid. On 16 August 1882 he sends this report to the Minister “On the researches carried out around the coral banks in the seas off Sciacca.”
Concerning the first bank, the one discovered by Alberto Maniscalco in May 1875, Canestrini says that “it is covered in mud and not very extensive, as it is only 200 meters long and even less in width.” He adds another interesting note for our purposes:
“The coral fished in this site, along with other sea life and a great amount of mud, all lack a ‘sarcosoma’ (a sort of a second skin), indicating that it was dead and thus unable to repopulate the bank.”
to be Continued...
[text taken with license from the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!

Read More »

Coral Mystery pt.IV the Study

Looking at it from the outside, objectively and with no emotional involvement (exactly the opposite of my own reactions), it becomes immediately obvious that many rushed to grab the coral, to plunder indiscriminately, but few, very few, ever asked themselves why this coral was there, in such great quantities, how it ended up there, and so on.
As is my habit, I applied to these studies the methods I was taught by my much beloved professor of Archaeology at the University, when he said:
“Look around you, try to imagine how things were in the period that interests you, ignore what’s been written by your contemporaries, always look for the source, the clues, the testimony of the era.”
So let’s begin.
To be Continued...

[text taken with license of the Author Giuseppe Rajola from the Book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!

Read More »

Coral Mystery pt.III the History

Almost 130 years have passed from the facts narrated.
What really struck me when I first began to study documents and to investigate the subject was that, wherever I went, wherever I looked, in web sites, papers or books on Sciacca and its coral, written by the Saccensi – as the people of Sciacca like to be called – I could find nothing. If you look on the Internet... nothing. If you go to Sciacca, apart from five or six shops that sell a bit of coral they say is from Sciacca, there’s really not much else.
Memory completely wiped out. Why?
Then I understood.
If we consider Torre del Greco, the Torresi fishermen have been going coral fishing since the 1500s, maybe even before that. Three hundred years later, in 1805, the fortunate insight of the Bourbons encouraged the people of Torre to also begin to craft the coral and, of course, to then sell it. Those who talk about a complete supply chain should know that the so highly disparaged Bourbons implemented a complete and successful supply chain over 200 years ago!
When Alberto Maniscalco discovered the first coral bank off the coast of Sciacca, everybody rushed there. Then they found a second... and a third.
Those fifteen years from 1875 to 1890 were only an episode in the history of Torre del Greco. But for Sciacca it was an epic, its entire history of coral. Not even a good one in the end, nor pleasant to remember, as there were more losers than winners.
The opposite was true for Torre del Greco, as on the plus/minus scale Torre could also count on revenue from the crafting of the coral.
In addition, once they finished fishing on the banks of Sciacca, as far as the Sciacchitani were concerned those unsold cases of coral massed in the depots and depreciated in value became a useless and expensive burden.
Not so in Torre del Greco, where everyone fearlessly held on to (and still holds on to) the coral, knowing that sooner or later they would craft it. And so it was.
And so it still is today. Although there is one additional aspect. It was during those years that the shops of Torre became factories, special skills were developed, production lines and industrial processes created.
In the early nineteen hundreds Torre already had companies (I use this term specifically) that employed hundreds of workers, with just as many doing piece work at home. It was during those years that Torre del Greco truly developed, to become first in its field, acquiring a worldwide monopoly on coral craftsmanship that still holds true today.
But we mustn’t forget that the merit for all this belongs to the coral harvested in Sciacca.
To be Continued....
[text taken with license of the author Giuseppe Rajola from the book Sciacca Mystery]

Enjoy!

Read More »

Coral Mystery pt.II the History

In the spring of 1879 all the boats returned, wandering over the new bank of which Commander La Via provides a full description and mapping:
“From the plan I am honored to send to Your Excellency you can see the position and the extent of the coral bank, and though it is not marked with astronomical precision, even its approximation should serve, especially as this is not a danger to navigation but is a coral bank of great depth that very shortly, once the coral is finished, will be returned to oblivion like the one discovered in 1875, not too distant from this one.”
That this was becoming something truly big, important even for the Sciac-chitani, who this time didn’t even dream of going fishing for anchovies, can be deduced from another passage written by La Via:
“I think by now we can say that coral fishing is becoming familiar even for the sailors of the Sicilian coasts, and in fact in the interval between last year’s fishing and this year’s, many Sciacca boat owners bought boats similar to those of Torre del Greco, with the same fishing equipment and even hired a few Torresi sailors to train the others in coral fishing.”
The Italian Statistical Annals reveal that 1879 was an excellent fishing season. In fact they harvested 980,000 kg of coral, an amount that yielded 8,330,000 lire to the 750 boats involved. But still nothing compared to what would happen the following year, in 1880.
In January a new bank was discovered, larger than all the others, described thusly in a Report by the Merchant Marine Headquarters: “it is located 39° 0’ south from Capo San Marco, about 36 and a half miles distant. The tallest section of the bank, called ‘sommo’ by the fishermen, lies about 68 meters below the sea and the remaining surface is of variable depths, extending up to 90 meters.
The fishermen believe that the bank extends for almost four miles in length and is an average of one a half mile in width. Five miles southeast of the bank is a small appendix, about 42 to 45 meters deep, also containing coral.”
This was an enormous bank! Everyone was euphoric. And justifiably so as they were able to work simultaneously on two banks, the one from 1878 and the one from 1890.
Almost 1,800 boats were used during this fishing season and approximately 17,000 men. Numbers that make the Klondike gold rush pale by comparison! The amount of coral harvested was also incredible: 4,492,500 kg, yielding a gross income of lire 22,462,000.
To be Continued...

[text taken wth license of the author of the book Sciacca Mystery- Giuseppe Rajola]
Enjoy!

Read More »

The Sciacca Mystery the History

In 1875, about 30 miles off the coast of Sciacca, Sicily, fishermen discovered a coral bank. But this coral was of a strange orange color, very different from what was normally found in the area. Stranger still was the fact that an enormous quantity of this coral was simply piled in great mounds in a very small area of the sea bed. News of the discovery quickly spread and teeming number of prefessional coral fishermen rushed to the area from everywhere, primarily to Torre del Greco. When it seemed that the bank was completely depleted, a second even larger bank was discovered, and then a third, larger still. The fishing went on for over twenty years, until the end of the century. But rather than fishing this was harvest. A unique, exceptional, unrepeatable event.
It was calculated that over 14,000 tons of coral were extracted from these banks.
Numerous scientists of the era were assigned to study the phenomenon, to try to understand the reason for all that coral and if such massive harvesting could damage its eventual reproduction in the same area. The answer was always the same; the coral was there because of a volcano located in the same area. A volcano that a few years prior had erupted into a island, the Isola Ferdinandea, the island that never was. It was all dead coral, and such it could not reproduce.
No one ever wondered why there was such a massive amount of coral in that site, nor how an organic matter like coral could be preserved in spite of such high temperatures.
No on, that is, until now.

Enjoy!

Read More »

Volcano Rising

He may be a historian by training, but Dr. Ralph Harrington really gets his blood pumping by studying volcanoes, a past time that has followed him since seeing his first volcano Vesuvias alongside the Bay of Naples when he was very small.
He seems to know quite a lot about the connection between volcanoes and marine life too.  Through this Q&A with him, I learned that 80% of the world's volcanoes are beneath the ocean, many volcanoes are often associated with saltwater, but freshwater too, and that ocean acidification is often increased by volcanic activity (he points out a huge example in the interview below.)
To appease his insatiable curiosity for volcanoes and earth science, Dr. Harrington started the Volcanism blog--the kind of blog he wished for in the past, but created himself.
Volcanoes and marine biology: Truly an ever intriguing topic, and one that has become even more fascinating thanks to Dr. Ralph Harrington.

Why study volcanoes? 


There are countless reasons – volcanoes are such many-faceted and fascinating phenomena. Volcanism has played a key role in shaping the world around us: whatever processes you look at, from the shaping of the continents to the creation of the Earth’s oceans and atmosphere, volcanism has had a role to play. The organic building-blocks of life itself may owe their existence to volcanic activity in the oceans. Then there is the question of how humanity lives with volcanoes: the risks they pose, the benefits they offer. Finally, I would mention the cultural and historical aspects of volcanoes, their role in art, religion, the human imagination.  
 


Does your research on and fascination and experience with volcanoes connect or relate to the marine world? 


Perhaps here I should mention some personal influences. The first volcano I ever saw was Vesuvius, when I was a small child. The Bay of Naples region, with its deep and complex geological and human history, and that image of the sea, the volcano and the town spreading itself between the two – these have always remained in my mind as an archetype of the interaction between volcanoes and human society, which is where my fascination with volcanoes begins. As a historian I have researched the development of ideas about volcanoes in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, when debates about the supposed role of the sea in volcanic activity were at the core of disputes between those who believed volcanoes were unimportant superficial phenomena and those who saw them as fundamental geological processes. My work as a historian and my fascination with volcanoes continually seem to bring me back to the marine world. 
 


What would the world be surprised to learn about volcanoes existing in or near the ocean? 


Perhaps how many of them there are, for a start. It’s been estimated that 80 per cent of the world’s volcanoes are beneath the oceans. These submarine volcanoes are very active, and in some cases surprisingly explosive. Very recently there has been some interesting news coverage of West Mata, a submarine volcano at the northern end of Tonga Trench in the south-west Pacific that U.S. scientists visited in remotely-operated submersibles in the spring of 2009. The vents at West Mata are over a kilometer below the surface, where the pressure should be too great for explosive activity, and yet the video these scientists shot shows the volcano roaring away like a firework display. The reason must be in the volatility of the magma, but surprises like this show how much there is still to explore and understand about submarine volcanism. 

Of course, even when volcanoes are not beneath the seas, they like to cluster in oceanic settings, as anyone looking at a map of the Earth’s volcanoes will notice. Most of the active continental volcanism on the planet is near the sea, because of the role of plate tectonics: heavy oceanic crust is subducted beneath lighter continental crust, so that classically you get a trench in the seabed and a line of volcanoes offset from the trench, fed by magma that rises from the subduction zone to the surface. Those volcanoes may be in the coastal region of a landmass or in a chain of islands: if you look down the Pacific coast of Russia, along the Kuril Islands and down through Japan, you can see how the volcanoes crowd along the coastal areas and island chains. Indeed, practically the whole Pacific Ocean is circled by regions of active volcanism, the famous Pacific ‘Ring of Fire’. It’s understandable that some volcano-watchers of previous ages thought that the sea directly drove volcanism, when you look at how many volcanoes are in marine settings. 

And people might be surprised by how important the relationship between volcanoes and water is, even when not directly concerned with the seas. Hydrovolcanism is an important aspect of volcanic activity, the relationship between volcanic activity and rainfall is a very important one, and many volcanoes are associated with bodies of fresh water. Crater lakes, often rendered highly acidic by volcanic emissions, are a whole area of study – and of potential volcanic hazard – in themselves.


How does having a volcano in the area affect the marine life there? 


Superficially, it would appear that an active volcano is a disaster for the life around it, in a marine setting as much as on land. A volcano might erupt on an island and destroy everything living there, or a flank collapse could produce a destructive tsunami; ashfall or acidic emissions might destroy life in a lake or an area of ocean. But there’s much more to the interaction of volcanoes and marine life than that, and it is far from being all a tale of destruction. 

As I mentioned earlier the building blocks of life on this planet may owe their very existence to marine volcanic processes. As we’ve come to know more about spreading ridges, black smokers and other aspects of submarine volcanism we’ve come to realize that an active volcano in the ocean does not result in a dead zone – anything but. Life is highly dynamic and will adapt to whatever conditions it finds itself in. The relationship between life and volcanism is an excellent example. Despite the poisonous and acidic emissions, heat and disruptive activity of active volcanism, certain forms of life flourish around volcanoes, relishing the heat and thriving on the emissions. Volcanism has been part of the marine biosphere for as long as there has been such a thing, and until plate tectonics grinds to a halt and the last volcano goes cold, marine life and volcanism will continue to get on fine.
 
 

You recently wrote a great blog entry in September about how a volcano in the Pacific is causing ocean acidification.  What other issues (marine conservation, climate change, etc.) can a volcano in or near a body of water cause.


‘In or near’ is an important distinction. A volcano in the water directly impacts upon its composition and behavior – acidification is an example, and this has a clear effect upon the life around it. A volcano near the water will impact upon it indirectly: its ash will fall into the water, flank collapses and lava emissions into the ocean can have a destructive impact, at least in the short term. These issues affect lakes near or in volcanoes as much as bodies of oceanic water. Ecosystems can be disrupted by volcanic activity, and will take time to adapt and recover. As for climate change, that’s a very big question! Climate is dynamic, not static, and volcanoes are an important factor in the ways climate changes over time. The more we study and understand the role of volcanoes in climatic variation, past and present, the better we will understand what is happening now and may happen in the future. And don’t forget, volcanoes have the capability to affect climate both gradually and catastrophically. Earth’s geological history, and the history of Earth’s climate, is punctuated by global volcanic cataclysms – that is, they would be cataclysmic for humanity. The planet rolls on regardless. 
 

How do these volcanoes affect marine life? 


A recent eruption in Tonga left fish and marine birds dead for miles around; likewise, the eruption of Kasatochi in the Aleutians turned a formerly thriving island ecosystem into an ash-covered wasteland. But life returns and adapts immediately: as in the case of Mount St Helens on land, volcanic activity at sea may seem to offer nothing but destruction but in fact it is part of the natural cycle of change and renewal. Undersea volcanism itself produces nutrients, recharging the water with the materials it needs to sustain life. 

The case of the acidification of the ocean by volcanic activity is an interesting one. The example I wrote about in the blog post you mention above was Maug in the Marianas Islands. Here the acidity of the upper 100 meters of the ocean has been increased 30% by volcanic activity: many organisms cannot live in such conditions at all, and corals and shellfish that do survive there have to use much more energy to sustain their shells. In a study of a Japanese submarine volcano called Eifuku scientists found that mussels were in effect cannibalizing their shells for the carbonate they needed for their internal chemistry, with the result that their shells were very thin and weak. It’s important that we know about these effects, and are aware of how life adapts and changes in acidified ocean environments. 
 


 
Is there anything the average person can do to help protect marine life and/or the ocean in areas where there is threat of a volcano eruption? 


The average person should always be doing what he or she can to understand the world about them, geologically, biologically and in other ways, so that every response to environmental change of whatever kind can be an informed response. But volcanic eruptions are part of the natural world, not a threat to it, in the seas and elsewhere, and there is little anyone can do about them. In a limited way there might be a role for human intervention in some particular cases: in the Galapagos Islands, for example, particularly destructive volcanic eruptions might lead to the evacuation of the local tortoises, and in Japan recently albatrosses from a colony on the active volcanic island of Tori-shima were recently transferred to another island where they will not be threatened by volcanic activity. But generally speaking marine volcanic eruptions offer people little opportunity to do anything directly – except study, observe, and learn. 

Finally, and this applies to marine and other environments, it’s worth making the point that human life needs protecting as well. Many volcanoes are in poor parts of the world, where the condition of the people is not helped by the pressures of irresponsible tourism, even if it is well-meaning. Volcano tourism is increasingly popular, but if you travel to areas such as the islands of the Pacific, Central America, or Indonesia, do it in a way that helps the people who have to make a living there – go with a professional sustainable travel company or tour organizer, there are many to chose from these days. And while we’re on the subject, even volcanoes are not free of the plague of litter, and I’d want to echo what Mathias Koester (who blogs as The Lost Geologist) said in your interview with him: wherever you go and whatever you do, take your rubbish away with you! 


[Interview by Ava taken from thereeftank.com]
Enjoy!

Read More »

Coral Mistery the History

In March/April 1877 there they all were once again. Collecting the crumbs, (kg. 275,000) and selling, in fact almost donating, the coral, earning a total amount of 3,400,000 lire.
A report issued by the Merchant Marine Headquarters, dated 27 November 1887, provides some interesting information about the bank:
“It’s not very large, as it is simply a large underwater bank measuring about two or three hundred meters in length and less than that in width. The fishermen say that it is shaped like a cone, whose top is about 146 meters from the surface of the sea. In the first few years they harvested a great deal of excellent live coral, although those who cleaned it had to work in shifts because of the restricted area. Since so many boats had come, the bottom was soon thoroughly raked by the ‘ingegni’, such that a few years later fishermen found only a very small quantity of dead and fragmented coral, and the bank having by now become unproductive was abandoned. In May of 1887 the Commander of the royal steamship Muran plumbed its depths 24 times, to a minimum depth of 163 and a maximum of 215 meters; the sea bed was also dredged using the device employed by the coral boats but all they found was grey sand, with no trace of coral; they did not even find the summit of the cone or the top of the bank mentioned by the fishermen.”
Food for thought: there had been a mountain of coral and now it no longer existed. The fishermen had torn from the sea from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 70 meters of coral!
In 1878 something new happened: around the beginning of August a new bank was discovered, not very far from the first. A description is provided in a Report issued by the Merchant Marine Headquarters: “as they were lamenting the scarce product of the first bank, a second one was discovered about 12 miles south-west of the previous one, almost 24 miles from Capo San Marco, at a bearing of 45°SW’.
“According to the fishermen this bank had a surface area of seven nautical miles in circumference and appeared to be an appendix to the adjacent Graham Shoal, which is significantly higher. Three coral zones were found in a NE, SE and WNW direction from the center of the bank, forming a channel over one mile long and three quarters of a mile wide. The zone to the northeast, which has provided good coral, lies at a depth of 80 to 85 meters, the eastern zone forms an inclined plane, from 90 to 95 meters deep while the western zone is less deep and is more favorable to the production of coral.
“Mindful of what had happened a few years prior, fishermen and boats from all over came, “numbering approximately 500, from Torre del Greco, Leghorn, Sciacca, and Trapani. There were even some boats from France and Malta and the product of the first year exceeded two and a half million lire”.
Highly significant in giving an idea of the conditions in which the fishermen worked in 1878, is the report that Commander G. La Via sends to the Minister:
“I am honored to provide Your Excellency with the following report on coral fishing in the waters of Sciacca.
“Around the end of the month of August 1878 several fishermen from Sciacca, who usually went fishing quite a distance from the coast, happened to find some pieces of coral in their nets, suggesting that there might be a coral bank in the vicinity, and this soon became a certainty. As soon as the news of this discovery became known, the site was inundated not only by all the boats of Sciacca, but also from nearby coasts and so the sardine fishermen soon became coral fishermen. Not last to arrive were the boats from Torre del Greco that usually went coral fishing along the coasts of Africa, but this time they preferred to go to the new bank that was soon invaded by numerous boats of different origins.

(text taken with license of the author from the book Sciacca Mistery -Giuseppe Rajola)

"To Be Continued..."

Read More »

The Discover of the Coral


Mid May 1875: Alberto Maniscalco, called Bertu Ammareddu (little shrimp) together with two of his friends, Giuseppe Muschidda and Alberto Occhidilampa, were on his boat. They were fishing using the parangali, a sort of mast with many hooks, about a dozen nautical miles off Capo San Marco, in other words near Sciacca.
When they pulled it up, it appeared to be very heavy, and Bertu had a surprise: a branch of coral had gotten stuck on the parangali! He lowered it again and the same thing happened: more coral.
He had discovered a coral bank!
When he returned to land at sunset, Bertu recounted the event to his incredulous fishermen friends, who “became convinced” only when Bertu showed them his extraordinary catch. In fact, they tried to find out more about where the bank was located. But Bertu would have none of it.
“If you want to know where I caught the coral, you have to give me three thousand lire” – such were the conditions of Bertu Ammareddu.
He was no fool! Three thousand lire, in those days, equaled a year of work for a fisherman
He was booed and jeered! But in the end they agreed on 250 lire, collected from among all the fishermen.
Not a great amount but it did allow him to enjoy a few luxuries.
The problem, however, was another: the fishermen of Sciacca were excellent at fishing anchovies and sardines, but they knew nothing about coral. So they decided to go see some “experts” and went, very confidentially, to a few boats from Torre del Greco that were fishing in the area and had stopped in Trapani.
You know how these things turn out: if you want a secret not to be a secret, talk to someone confidentially! They had sent the lamb to the wolves. Everyone tried to get into the act! From Trapani, Port Empedocles, Mazara del Vallo. All the fishermen of Torre del Greco and anywhere else, stopped fishing wherever they were and all rushed to the new bank.
The “Maritime Review” 2° Trim. 1876 reported that: “About 170 boats from Torre del Greco rushed from wherever they were after the discovery of the coral bank of Capo San Marco.”
“The Sciacchitani – said Commander E. Accinni, Commander of the ‘Esploratore’, a warship sent to maintain some sort of order – because of old prejudices, wanted to push everyone back and words quickly turned to actions, making it necessary to send a warship.”
It was a very real and serious problem. The bank was not very wide, and so it was unthinkable that 360 boats could be there simultaneously (145 Torresi, 124 Sciacchitani, 51 from Port Empedocles, 30 from Trapani, 30 from Mazara del Vallo, and even 1 from Alghero). Maneuvering space was insufficient and so they organized shifts, which were respected thanks to the presence of the warship, Esploratore, and everything went smoothly.
The bank at first provided good coral and according to Commander Accinni, “a small boat with 8 men collected from 15 and sometimes up to 20 kilograms a day; and since the price had been set at 30 lire per kilo, with a 5% tare, they earned a daily average of five hundred lire.
“This was not prime quality coral as it had little consistency but they collected so much that it was more profitable than the finer coral harvested in other sites.
“As the bank slowly became depleted, the Schiacchitani and the small boats lagged behind, because their fishing gear was not like that of the Torresi, strong enough to uproot the coral attached to the very bottom and at greater depth. In addition to the lesser quantity, its value also began to decrease, such that while on June 15 it was sold at 30 lire per kilogram with a 5 percent tare, on July15 it had gone down to 20 lire with 8 percent tare, on August 15 to 10 lire with 10 percent tare and in the final days it was being sold at 6 lire with a 19 percent tare.
“By the beginning of August, a small boat could not harvest more than 8 kilograms of coral a day, and the daily earnings of 500 lire in the beginning had by now become 72 lire a day.
“In August the sailors of Sciacca go fishing for sardines and anchovies which provide them with greater earnings, and so that month, tired from the brief coral campaign to which they were not accustomed, they returned to their customary type of fishing.”
It’s extraordinary how a man of the sea like Commander E. Accinni, manages – in the report he provided to the Minister – to flavour his report with both financial and social aspects. He concludes by saying:
“We can consider the fishing season over; the last remaining boats of Torre del Greco are preparing to leave.
“The bank is depleted and unless another one is discovered there will surely be no need to send another warship the following year to perform the same duties as the Esploratore.”
This was in October 1875. According to Accinni the bank would not be providing any more coral the following year. But what happens in 1876? You would think that no one would return to that particular bank. And you would be wrong: because more than 550 boats, compared to the 360 of the previous year, showed up!
But the quantity of coral fished in 1876 was 330,000 kg. compared to the 360,000 of the previous year. Which means that, on the average, each of the 550 boats brought home 600 kg of coral compared to the 1,000 kg of the preceding year.
(text taken with license of the author from the book Sciacca Mistery -Giuseppe Rajola)

"To Be Continued..."

Read More »

A History of Coral of times gone by

Lost Island Project pruodly presents an abstract of the incredible history of the Sciacca Coral. Thanks to our new expert dott. Giuseppe Rajola, one of the most red coral expert in the world and CEO of Rajola SPA, who give us the opportunity to share with you his incredible scientific research on this mysterious coral founded for the first time in 1875. You will discover the connection between the coral and the Lost Island volcano. You will love it!
Thank dott. Rajola to your support on our project.
Lost Island Project Team.

Read More »

What we are looking for: Fumarole

The exhalative field, strictly elongated north-south, from the depths of 90-100 m is followed down along the side of the building and then through the floor with marine volcanic, with an overall probably more than 3 km. The fumaroles have a reach really very high and give rise to violent eruptions gaseous form of chains of bubbles, which rise to several tens of meters forming dense and wide (20-30 m) columns; higher columns fray and thin, while remaining perfectly recognizable to the surface, where you can see large bubbles still on the rise. This is not the usual fumarolic exhalations; seem continuous steam of the geysers, expelled under great pressure.
We used (Sanfilippo, Lanzafame, 2006) a camera mounted in a Remote Operated Vehicle (ROV) to study the fumarolic field in the floor with marine volcanic and we followed him to the north, to a depth of 173 m, without reaching the northern limit . The study of the seabed outside the northern base of the cone, showed that they are made from mobile sediments, sandy-muddy, whitish and organogenic nature. There are also isolated blocks, the number and the size of which increases in the vicinity of the cone, to indicate their origin gravitational at the expense of the slopes of the building. The sea floor is largely covered by a veil of black sand of volcanic origin, composed of material ialoclastico, as shown by the analysis of samples collected during the background investigation. The volcanic sands, with evidence, have been observed to hold the blocks and also sessile organisms living. The depths of the whole area examined (about 1 sq. km) are littered with depression, funnel-shaped, metric sizes (diameter and depth), often organized along north-south orientations, some of which are still home to very weak fumaroles. These findings, in reference to what is known even about the fields exhalative land, indicate that small craters are now sold out of the product flow fumarole high energy which, when they were in business, digging troughs removing the finest materials , bringing them up and dispersing them in the area. The observation of granules blacks, of volcanic origin, of living organisms confirms unequivocally that the phenomenon is still in place in the adjacent volcanic areas.

Enjoy!

Read More »

Scientific Research

Overall, the volcanic products erupted in the Sicily Channel constitute a bimodal sodic, moderately alkaline association. The basic rocks, alkali basalts and hawaiites, are largely
predominant, and in many volcanic areas, as on the island of Linosa and in the submarine volcanoes of Adventure plateau and Graham and Nameless Banks, are the only products found. The general petrologic features of the volcanism of the Sicily Channel point to an anorogenic magmatism similar to that found in continental rift areas (Corti et al. 2006). The trace element distribution is comparable with that observed in intraplate basalts or ocean island basalts. Petrological evidence suggests that the ascent of magmas to the surface was relatively rapid, probably through channels superim- posed over the major tectonic discontinuities of the rift. Major and trace element data indicate an ocean island basalt affinity for Graham and Nameless Banks alkaline lavas and a depleted tholeiitic signature for one Pantelleria seamount, which had a shallower mantle source (Rotolo et al. 2006).
On a regional scale, the distribution of the positive magnetic anomalies appear to follow two main trends: one (where the largest magnetic anomaly was found) follows the axis of the Pantelleria Graben, slightly shifted to the south; the other situated along a broad NNE-SSW-oriented belt extending from Linosa Island to the eastern margin of the Nameless Bank. This belt partly coincides with that proposed by Argnani (1990) on the basis of bathymetric, volcanic, and seismic considerations, and was interpreted as a strike-slip transfer fault zone separating the rift system in two independent areas, the Pantelleria Graben to the west and the Malta and Linosa grabens to the east. The factors playing a major role in the distribution and affinity of the Sicily Channel volcanic rocks appear to be: (a) the petrological characteristics of the mantle source; (b) the geodynamic processes responsible of the crustal rifting, which in turn depends of the grade of intensity of the extensional stresses; (c) the presence of pre-existing crustal tectonic structures which favoured the rising of the mag- matic manifestations.
The main magnetic anomaly is closely related to a large magmatic body in correspondence to a boundary fault of the south–western Pantelleria Graben. Boundary faults seem to have played a crucial role in the distribution of volcanic manifestations, probably because they channeled the magmatic material along the principal fault planes. The other two anomalies seem to be either related to: (a) a sort of off-axis volcanism, because they are located relatively close to the boundary faults, but in an external position on the shoulders of the rift, as occurring in other divergent systems, like a segment of the East African Rift, where Bosworth (1987) described paired zones of volcanism and lithospheric thinning off-axis from the rift proper; or (b) to a focussing of magma emplacement in correspondence with a structurally complex area (where pre-existing structures are present) representing a transfer zone between the Pantelleria and Linosa/Malta grabens. Geophysical data show that the rifting in this sector of the African platform is a passive response to a regional stress field, allowing hot mantle rocks to penetrate locally the lithosphere. Ascend- ing magmas within the Pantelleria Graben floor seem to migrate from the S to E sector of the depression toward the N–W sector, which is almost entirely floored by igneous material, and where the volcanic edifice of the Pantelleria Island, elongated in the same direction as the rift itself, is emerged (Civile et al. 2010).
There are some analogies between the Sicily Channel volcanism and the main Ethiopian rift volcanism, where the structural control (both inherited and/or rift-related) on magma emplacement played a major role, with major magmatic features located in specific structural locations like boundary faults and transfer zones (Corti 2008). The sequence of events in this segment of the East African Rift system includes a first episode of volcanism (possibly with coeval doming), later followed by lithospheric rifting connected to the Afar plume, that in turn may be a superficial expression of a deeper (lower mantle) superp- lume (Corti 2009).

Enjoy!

Read More »

A taste of Sicily


More of a sugar-spiked espresso than a milky cappuccino, Sicily will reward you with an intense bittersweet experience rather than anything lightweight and frothy. In Sicily it seems as though the sun shines brighter, the shadows are darker, and life is lived full on and for the moment. Overloaded with art treasures, undersupplied with infrastructure and continuously struggling to thwart Mafia-driven corruption, Sicily possesses some baffling social topography. Brace yourself to reconcile baroque architectural beauty in Catania with modern squalor in Palermo, artistic excellence with moral ambivalence and the rational with the sensual. This is an island to be visited with an open mind – and a healthy appetite; one factor remains a constant, and that is the uncompromisingly high quality of the cuisine.
After some 25 centuries of foreign domination, Sicilians are heir to an impressive cultural legacy, from the refined architecture of Magna Graecia to a beguiling, if contradictory, artistic fusion of Arab craftsmanship and Norman austerity. This complexity of culture is matched by a startling diversity of landscape that includes the smouldering Mt Etna, an aquamarine coastline with a tiara of Aeolian Islands and Parco Naturale Regionale Delle Madonie.
Today, Sicily’s new generation is loathe to remain trapped in the past. New ventures are seeing aristocratic entrepreneurs prising open the doors of some of Europe’s finest palazzi and villas, while sensitive agriturismi (farm stay accommodations) are shedding light on Sicily’s hidden rural treasures and national parks. Sicily also has a refreshing lack of neon-blazing entertainment and theme parks, which further helps preserve its individuality and appeal.

Enjoy!

Read More »

The road to discovery

 

The road to discovery

In our previous posts we have talked about the Balck Smokers and their great scientific importance. The evidence that we have collected over the last few days, give us hope. As you know the Island Ferdinandea is an unknown destination and out of the reach of diving centers, which in this area can be counted on the fingers of one hand. The stories of those few divers told us of a few sightings of bubbles coming from the bottom. It is important to understand that the island, even after 200 years after its sinking, is unexplored. Over the years there have been some scientific expeditions, but none of this has ever made an objective study of the seabed with the help of divers. Those who have immersed, they did it with outdated equipment and always with air, reaching at maximum the foot of the volcano and only for a few minutes, limiting their activities in some sampling of rocks. The awareness of being the first to venture on those unknown depths in the middle of the Strait of Sicily is a strong stimulus and feeds the discovery of fire that burns within us. But back to the mysterious object of our research, those "Black Smokers" or "Fumaroli," which should provide basic information about the origin of the volcano. We have combined the testimonies of divers to Multibeam data in our possession and we were able to highlight two zones within which exist the possibility to find a clear rising gas coming from underground. Proceed according to schedule, our first goal is to map the volcanic cone and highlight in a first stage a series of geological and biological Main Target. The map will be a key tool in our subsequent search of the mysterious gas lift. To know every centimeter  of the environment where we make our research is an indispensable condition for our success. If we manage to find the Balck Smokers our task will be to film them and to sample the gas that escapes from them paying attention to everything around them. The data we collect and the video samples will be sent to our scientific directors, who will analyze and study them. There is no doubt, if we could find one of these gas lift, this would be an exceptional find and probably one of the first ever occurred in the Mediterranean Sea.
We are ready ... and you?
Enjoy!

Read More »

Lost Island: What we are lookin' for Part II

 

Did you ever imagine that life could start at the very depths of the ocean floor? Some scientists hypothesize, with help from studies on “black smokers,” that underwater sea vents could be originators of life.

According to a 2007 report on livescience.com, geologists from Saint Louis University have discovered 1.43 billion-year-old fossils of deep-sea microbes next to fossils of sea vents. The new finding provides scientists with evidence that life may have started on the very bottom of the ocean floor.
Black smokers were discovered in 1977 as hydrothermal sea vents by scientists at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. The initial black smoker found was located in the East Pacific Rise in the Pacific Ocean, near the Galápagos Islands. Underwater vents are also being discovered in the Atlantic Ocean and along the Pacific Antarctic Ridge. The Earth Institute at Columbia University says that the latest locations to search for sea vents is about 1,000 miles from the west coast of Antarctica, where geochemist Gisela Winckler thinks sea vents could be located. With help from her colleagues, they have pinpointed six spots on the remote Pacific Antarctic Ridge where they think sea vents could appear.
According to the scientists in the College of Earth, Ocean, and Environment at the University of Delaware, a hydrothermal vent is a geyser on the seafloor. A geyser on the seafloor would be similar to a spring; in this case it erupts periodically, ejecting a column of hot water and steam into the water above. These sea vents constantly discharge extremely-hot, mineral-rich water that helps sustain a varied population of organisms.
Some black smokers have chimney-like pinnacles, and are formed from suspended metals that precipitate out when the super-hot vent water meets the neighboring cold ocean water. The temperature of the water that comes out of the chimney of these vents surpasses 360 °C. Most black smokers are found to be at an average depth of about 2,100 meters in areas of seafloor spreading along the Mid-Ocean Ridge system. These black smokers are the hottest of vents, ejecting mainly iron and sulfide, thus making iron monosulfide. With this compound, the black color is produced, hence showing where the name came from.
"Most of the deep ocean is like a desert, but these vents are oases of life and weirdness," said Winckler. "The Pacific Antarctic ridge is one of the ridges we know least about."
“Wherever we look along the ridge, we find vents,” Christopher German said in a 2007 interview, “and the vents in different regions of the ocean host very different animals.” German, Chief Scientist of Deep Submergence at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, conducts research on black smokers..
“Roughly 550 vent species have been discovered living in extreme temperature and pressure conditions, and new vent species are discovered at a rate of nearly two per month,”said Paul Tyler with the British National Oceanography Centre, Southampton.
Unique arrays of ecosystems are found around these underwater structures. People believed that all life on Earth sustained its energy from the sun; now that assumption is being challenged with proof of underwater creatures. Giant tubeworms, around eight feet tall take over most of the surrounding area, and clams cover the seafloor.
Creatures, such as eyeless shrimp and giant crabs, are also found around vents and get their food directly from black smokers. This is a process known as chemosynthesis. Bacteria in the water feed on noxious chemicals, and then smaller animals feed on these bacteria, and those smaller animals provide food for the larger animals. This creates a whole new ecosystem, separate from any other in the world of light, say experts.
These vents form on the seafloor, because in some regions along the Mid-Ocean Ridge, the colossal plates that form the Earth’s crust are spreading apart, constructing fractures and gaps in the bed of the seafloor. As seawater moves into openings, it becomes heated by magma that lies beneath Earth’s crust. As the water is boiling, it rises and looks for a path back out into the ocean through another opening; this creates the black smoker.
“I think that the idea that life originated from black smokers is a very plausible theory,” says Sam Berendzen, science instructor at Francis Howell High School. “However, we still need more evidence to resolve problems of the origin of life.”

Here some links to download pdf files on Black Smokers and a really cool video from ROV

Enjoy!

Read More »

Pictures by GUE and Lundgren Brothers. Powered by Blogger.